add to wish list | library

91 of 94 recommend this,
would you recommend it?

yes | no

Support this site by purchasing from these vendors using the links provided below. As an Amazon Associate earns from qualifying purchases.

Reviews: Eric Clapton: Slowhand

Reviews: 9

Review by JW December 19, 2004 (2 of 8 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:
The Layla disc a 'must have' SACD, so is 461 Ocean Boulevard. This one is not. Musically it's all a little 'smooth sailing'. Pleasant enough, but unremarkable. Of course it has 'Cocaine' and 'Wonderful Tonight' - the latter really a nice ballad, but spoiled by wedding singers I'm afraid. Yes, I am a Clapton fan!

For a sonic comparison I have on hand the Polydor re-master of Slowhand (P2 31825). The SA-CD seems clearly better than the remastered CD. The CD offers a more distant perspective on the music. The SA-CD sounds much nicer overall. More 3-D and more believable on voice. Having said all that, this is not one of the better sounding SA-CD's. What's not on the recording cannot be recovered, alas.


Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by Gazza January 9, 2005 (1 of 4 found this review helpful)
Not a Clapton fan (previosly only owned the 'Cream Of...' CD), but this SACD was a good price and worth it for Cocaine and The Core alone.

I've purchased a couple of copies which seem to exhibit the same fault. On track 1 (Cocaine), when listening to the multichannel mix, the bass track drops out between 2:39 to 2:50 (~11 seconds). I'm sure this is a fault with the SACD master and not my system, but it would be interesting to hear if anyone else experiences the same problem.

I can't find any contact details to report the problem to Universal or the manufacurer of the disc, and Best Buy (where it was purchased) are useless!

I have a budget system so I can't really comment too much on the sound quality of this release. The bass sounds a little 'odd' on a couple of tracks, but having not heard the original, it could be intentional.


Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by ianlow32 July 21, 2005 (13 of 13 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:    
Finally, Slowhand comes to hi-resolution format. I have heard multiple CD versions from the original to the Gold Disc to the remastered, but this new SACD version just blows the rest away.

Slowhand has always been my favourite Clapton album over the years. Classic Clapton originals like Lay Down Sally and Wonderful Tonight define his style and songwriting capabilities and singing. His voice has an aching and tender reach on the ballads, and yet bluesy growl on the fast tracks.

From 461 and Slowhand, Clapton began to rely less on his guitar prowess on albums, but move towards stronger songwriting and singing to establish his albums, and Slowhand is the best example of it. And yet, his taste for covers cannot be faulted either.

Dusting off JJ Cale's Cocaine and William's We're With YOu All the Way shows how he can choose the right material to augment his own songs, until they blend into a seamless piece of excellent work.

Ending the album with an instrumental ballad that recalls the piano coda to Layla, Slowhand remains his best and most focused work over the years. And throw in a great guitar jam in the epic Core, you get a Clapton masterwork that is as timeless now as it was commercially and critically successful during its original release almost 30 years ago.

Listening to the 5.1 mix by the original producer, Glyn Johns did a superb work. Although some has commented the mix sounds muddy, its actually not and its true to its original sound. Its natural and spatial mix and creative surround mixing by Johns gives this classic a new dimension that was not there before.

The electric solos now sound more alive and kicking and even the tender fender licks that kick off Wonderful Tonight sounds so much there and enveloping. Its the drums that has a tendency to sound muddled underneath and the strong bass levels that gives the muddy impression. BUt '70s recordings tend to be presented in such fashion and listening it over again, the surround mix is just perfect and natural. Compared to the bright but not as creative surround mix of 461, this is far superior in the end.

A compulsory purchase and listening for every Clapton fan.

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by StyleAndEntertainmen October 27, 2005 (2 of 4 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:    
Just a quick note to say that JW has it exactly right. There are a couple of good songs on the disc but overall it's just "pleasant" (but not engaging). The sonics are fair with the highs really suffering the most. I haven't heard previous versions so can't comment on those, but the sonics on this one are just mediocre. I'd pass on Slowhand unless you really want those few good songs or you've "got to catch them all."

Update: I just listened to the stero version and find it is much better. I actually like this album now and do find it engaging. Wow! Even the sound is better (better clarity on the cymbals) given it's mid 70's sound. Try the stereo mix you may like it better too. It's weird because the mc mix is not aggressive. Sometimes I think simple music should just be left simple. Certainly works here for me and I'm raising my ratings accordingly.


Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by Croc June 28, 2006 (0 of 5 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:  
very very fun disc !!!
how can't you love it? :-)

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by rburra July 1, 2006 (0 of 2 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:  
I have only heard the stereo SACD layer, and over my speakers it sounds wonderful and very satisfying to hear these classic tracks like over an LP but without the crackle and pops. However the quality of the master is not on par with modern recordings as is clear if you hear them on headphones like the HD600s. It is of course an order of magnitude better than the CD, so for that reason it is a must have. Even though the master is not as smooth as DSD recordings, it is still the master (AC hum and all) so that is the only reference we have,,,

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by progboy May 10, 2012
Performance:   Sonics:  
Slowhand is my favorite of the Clapton albums and I was very pleased to hear this one on glorious SACD. This one of the first SACD's I bought and have been quite impressed with the transfer. The music is very rich and warm and blows away the redbook CD that I had in my collection. This SACD is bright but yet not over the top and offers nice instrumentation separation over your speakers.
Peaches and Diesel is one of the great tracks from this album and sounds magical when turned up just a bit louder than "11".

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by Techno-Crit January 21, 2014 (1 of 1 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:  
Good grief what more could you ask ?
1. I had and have the vinyl and have always liked it .
2. I have the standard CD and it is not quite as good as the vinyl for all the old reasons.
3. I have just listened to my new SA-CD of Slowhand and may I say Holy Fecal Output !
This is without a doubt the cleanest,brightest and defined version of Slowhand I have ever heard.
It was very much like meeting an old friend from high school and realising you still liked them and maybe more than ever !
I am not going to go into all the little nit picky audio faults you may or may not hear defined by what your playing system is all about. And I don't use MC, just 2 channel stereo. But his CD has just been elevated to one of my fav's and I will probably be comparing a lot of my new purchases in the future to it.

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by jaburcke July 1, 2015 (1 of 3 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:  
This recording has been in my libarary in one way or another since it's release in the seventies. It has always been a favorite. The multichannel mix is very good and enjoyable. It has always been a mellow mix but the DSD mastering is superb. If this is favorite of yours, you cant go wrong!

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no