|
|||||||||
|
Name: |
Petri Kaipiainen | |
Details: |
||
Location: |
||
HiFi: |
||
Email: |
||
Web: |
||
Posts: |
173 |
Reviews |
Found: 0 |
December 4, 2009
|
|
Deleted by zeus. ... more | |
December 4, 2009
|
|
It has to be one darn quiet living room (but nobody livin in it) to have 20 dB ambient noise level. My "studio" is in a quiet neigbourhood with no traffic, no AC, no appliances running and still the ambient noise is around 30 dB, mostly low frequences from somewhere. You should always measure with C weighting, or all the low rumbles are not ... more | |
December 4, 2009
|
|
A recording engineer I know made +100 dB test CDs already in the nineties using a Sony DAT recorder. DR measured from the CD. "it may still contribute BUT NOT FULL TIME" You are not form the Nordic countries I take it? Addendum: Now I start to understand your repeated postings of those "impulse responses" of PCM and DSD done with simulated 3 ... more | |
December 4, 2009
|
|
Using one bit for sign does not take it away from contributing to the accuracy (basic math*, pal). What is this "using one bit for quantization"??? All the bits are used for quantization!!! Do I need to give a rest to erroneus facts? This is not trolling for suckers, but for getting facts straight. *) after 15 bit if we add one more, the scale is ... more | |
December 4, 2009
|
|
Actually it is possible to get over 100 dB of dynamic range on a 16 bit CD. Dither is the magic word. Without dither the theoretical maximum is 16x6.02 dB + 2 dB or so (forget the exact additional number) = 98.3 dB aprox. To find a performance (and recording venue) where this is possble to achieve and record is another matter. I do not know of any ... more |
|